Minutes of the Meeting of the BCS Fortran Specialist Group
held at the University of Manchester's Nuffield Radio
Astronomy Laboratories, Jodrell Bank, near Macclesfield
on 5 September 1991
Present: Miles Ellis Oxford University
David Lomas University of Salford
Mike Nunn CCTA
Mike Roth AEA Technology
Lindsey Savage MCC
Lawrie Schonfelder University of Liverpool
David Shone University of Manchester
Neil Smith Defence Research Agency, Bedford
Julian Tilbury University of Salford
John Wilson Leicester University
John Young PE-MOD
Also present from NRAL Jodrell Bank:
David Shone Tom Muxlow
Simon Garrington Roger Noble
Lindy Brett Michael Garrett
Neal Jackson Phil Powell
Euston Luckle
l. WELCOME
The Group was welcomed by David Shone who had organised the
visit to Jodrell Bank. The Chairman, Mike Roth, warmly thanked
David for finding the time to organise the day which was much
appreciated by the members present.
2. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Apologies for absence were received from David Muxworthy and
Les Russell.
3. REPORTS ON X3J3 AND ISO MEETINGS
Even though there were two X3J3/ISO representatives present,
it was decided that Miles Ellis would report on the recent WG5
meeting in Lund and the X3J3 meeting in Nashua.
The WG5 meeting in Lund at the end of June was the first
meeting after completion of the Fortran 90 Standard processing
and was best described as a "wary" meeting.
A number of items were discussed which had little to do with
current standard work. There was a discussion of ancillary
standards such as parallel processing, Fortran bindings for POSIX
and LCAS, and CLID and CLIP. The meeting agreed on what to do
next in Fortran and also discussed who owns Fortran, the US or
the rest of the world. Both WG5 and X3J3 will become involved
in interpretations of the Fortran 90 Standard and ISO will allow
certain revisions. However in the US, once an ANSI standard is
accepted, no changes can be made to the standard. Hence there
could be revisions to the international standard which would not
be applied to the US standard. Also the US will have two Fortran
standards; FORTRAN 77 will be an archival standard and Fortran
90 will be another standard. Also the US cannot adopt an ISO
standard whereas other countries, like the UK, can.
The ISO Fortran 90 Standard, which is identical to the ANSI
standard, was published at the beginning of August. The ANSI
Fortran 90 Standard had to go to a ballot of X3 which is probably
completed. However, there will be a number of NO votes but
probably not enough not to pass. There will be no revision of
this single standard. The ANSI Fortran 90 Standard will probably
be dated 1992.
At the Lund meeting a small sub-group with representatives
from various countries was set up. This group was given the
mandate to develop procedures for handling any revisions of the
Fortran 90 Standard and to advise on how Fortran will be
developed in the future. Currently, WG5 does the planning with
X3J3 doing the work, so work items can be different where they
should be the same. One possibility is for WG5 to operate as
X3J3 does now.
The X3J3 meeting at Nashua in August, like the WG5 meeting
at Lund, did little work on the Fortran 90 Standard. The
principal objectives of the meeting were to address the procedure
for requests for interpretations and clarifications of Fortran
90, to draft responses to three protest letters, to respond to
the WG5 Lund resolutions, and, like the WG5 meeting, to review
collateral standards. X3J3 decided to start the new round of
interpretations with a "clean slate" by dropping all outstanding
requests. The meeting approved the WG5 Lund resolutions and
concurred with the establishment of the WG5 sub-committee for
looking at how the next Fortran Standard would be produced.
The X3J3 also had a tutorial on the Journal of Development.
This Journal initially would preserve appendices from previous
drafts of the Fortran 90 Standard and could also be used as a
forum for new ideas in Fortran. A volunteer had been found for
a potential editor and an ad hoc committee had been formed.
4. BCS AND OTHER BUSINESS
Questionnaire
The Chairman, Mike Roth, had prepared a list of questions
about the use of Fortran and, in particular, Fortran 90 to be
sent to firms and groups. The SGMC had approved the form, in
principle, but needed to see the final version. The meeting
discussed the draft copy and a number of changes were proposed.
Computer Journal Algorithms Supplement
David Muxworthy had written to Mike Roth concerning the
latest issue of the Journal in August 1991 containing a final set
of Fortran algorithms. The Group agreed with David's comments
and agreed that a letter to the editor of the Journal voicing the
Group's concern would be sent. The Secretary was to write and
send an appropriate letter.
5. AFTERNOON SESSION
After an excellent buffet lunch, the Group were joined by
some members of staff at Jodrell Bank for a talk on "The Fortran
90 Standard" given by Lawrie Schonfelder of the University of
Liverpool Computer Laboratory. This talk was followed by an
"Introduction to Jodrell Bank" given by Tom Muxlow who gave a
short history of Jodrell Bank and described some of the latest
work being done. The talks were followed by an informal tour of
the facilities at Jodrell Bank led by David Shone.
John Young
Secretary
31 October 1991